Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1974 Jul;77(3):541–558. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.3.541

On the Structure of Gene Control Regions

Bruce Wallace 1, Thomas L Kass 1
PMCID: PMC1213146  PMID: 4414920

Abstract

A model emphasizing the possible genetic role of tandem duplications of reverse repeats has been developed as an extension of Crick's (1971) general model for the chromosomes of higher organisms. Although developed initially (1) to explain why random differences in the control regions of individual gene loci might confer a selective advantage on heterozygous individuals as well as (2) to offer the species a means by which such differences might be effected without mutational harm, it seems that control regions built on a foundation of tandemly duplicated reverse repeats would exhibit many properties previously observed in studies on mutable loci in various organisms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. EMMERLING M. H. An analysis of intragenic and extragenic mutations of the plant color component of the R? gene complex in Zea mays. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1958;23:393–407. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1958.023.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FALK R. Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? II. Experimental results. Genetics. 1961 Jul;46:737–757. doi: 10.1093/genetics/46.7.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Federer W. T., Steel R. G., Wallace B. Mathematical models for chromosomal inversions. Genetics. 1967 Apr;55(4):783–795. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.4.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gally J. A., Edelman G. M. The genetic control of immunoglobulin synthesis. Annu Rev Genet. 1972;6:1–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.06.120172.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jelinek W., Darnell J. E. Double-stranded regions in heterogeneous nuclear RNA from Hela cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2537–2541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MULLER H. J., FALK R. Are induced mutations in Drosophila overdominant? I. Experimental design. Genetics. 1961 Jul;46:727–735. doi: 10.1093/genetics/46.7.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Robertson H. D., Webster R. E., Zinder N. D. Purification and properties of ribonuclease III from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1968 Jan 10;243(1):82–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. WATSON J. D., CRICK F. H. The structure of DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1953;18:123–131. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1953.018.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wallace B. THE EFFECT OF HETEROZYGOSITY FOR NEW MUTATIONS ON VIABILITY IN Drosophila: A PRELIMINARY REPORT. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1957 May 15;43(5):404–407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.43.5.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES