Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1974 Feb;71(2):507–511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.2.507

Multiple Regulation of Galactose Operon—Genetic Evidence for a Distinct Site in the Galactose Operon that Responds to capR Gene Regulation in Escherichia coli K-12

Sui-Sheng Hua 1, Alvin Markovitz 1
PMCID: PMC388036  PMID: 4360947

Abstract

Previous results demonstrated that the capR (lon) locus, which is not linked to the gal operon, independently controls the synthesis of the gal operon enzymes and gal mRNA, i.e., galO+capR9 strains are derepressed 4- to 6-fold as compared to galO+capR+ strains. A mutation has been isolated and localized in the galactose operator region that defines a new and distinct site of control. Mutation in this site, designated galOcapR+, causes a 4-fold increase in the galactose enzymes, galactokinase (EC 2.7.1.6) and UDP-galactose-4-epimerase (EC 5.1.3.2), in a capR+ background. These mutants exhibit a reduced response to regulation by the unlinked regulator gene capR (lon). However, the galOcapR+ mutants are still subject to control by the galR repressor, since they can be further derepressed by growth in the presence of D-fucose. They also synthesize more galactokinase when grown in glycerol as compared to glucose. Thus there are now at least three, and probably four, sites for control of mRNA synthesis in the operator-promoter regions of the gal operon, making it one of the most complex control systems to date for a single operon in bacteria. The complexity is sufficient to accommodate models for differentiation in higher organisms that require more than one “switch” to control a single group of genes.

Keywords: lon, operator, galactose enzymes, differentiation

Full text

PDF
507

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arditti R., Grodzicker T., Beckwith J. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate-independent mutants of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1973 May;114(2):652–655. doi: 10.1128/jb.114.2.652-655.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beckwith J., Grodzicker T., Arditti R. Evidence for two sites in the lac promoter region. J Mol Biol. 1972 Aug 14;69(1):155–160. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blattner F. R., Dahlberg J. E., Boettiger J. K., Fiandt M., Szybalski W. Distance from a promoter mutation to an RNA synthesis startpoint on bacteriophage lambda DNA. Nat New Biol. 1972 Jun 21;237(77):232–236. doi: 10.1038/newbio237232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blattner F. R., Dahlberg J. E. RNA synthesis startpoints in bacteriophage lambda: are the promoter and operator transcribed? Nat New Biol. 1972 Jun 21;237(77):227–232. doi: 10.1038/newbio237227a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchanan C. E., Hua S. S., Avni H., Markovitz A. Transcriptional control of the calactose operon by the capR (lon) and capT genes. J Bacteriol. 1973 May;114(2):891–893. doi: 10.1128/jb.114.2.891-893.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buchanan C. E., Markovitz A. Derepression of uridine diphosphate-glucose pyrophosphorylase (galU) in capR(lon), capS, and capT mutants and studies on the galU repressor. J Bacteriol. 1973 Sep;115(3):1011–1020. doi: 10.1128/jb.115.3.1011-1020.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Crombrugghe B., Adhya S., Gottesman M., Pastan I. Effect of Rho on transcription of bacterial operons. Nat New Biol. 1973 Feb 28;241(113):260–264. doi: 10.1038/newbio241260a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Franklin N. C. Extraordinary recombinational events in Escherichia coli. Their independence of the rec+ function. Genetics. 1967 Apr;55(4):699–707. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.4.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hua S. S., Markovitz A. Multiple regulator gene control of the galactose operon in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1972 Jun;110(3):1089–1099. doi: 10.1128/jb.110.3.1089-1099.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Inselburg J. Formation of deletion mutations in recombination-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1967 Oct;94(4):1266–1267. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.4.1266-1267.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kalckar H. M., Kurahashi K., Jordan E. HEREDITARY DEFECTS IN GALACTOSE METABOLISM IN ESCHERICHIA COLI MUTANTS, I. DETERMINATION OF ENZYME ACTIVITIES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1959 Dec;45(12):1776–1786. doi: 10.1073/pnas.45.12.1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LENNOX E. S. Transduction of linked genetic characters of the host by bacteriophage P1. Virology. 1955 Jul;1(2):190–206. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(55)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LURIA S. E., ADAMS J. N., TING R. C. Transduction of lactose-utilizing ability among strains of E. coli and S. dysenteriae and the properties of the transducing phage particles. Virology. 1960 Nov;12:348–390. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(60)90161-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lieberman M. M., Buchanan C. E., Markovitz A. Derepression of GDP-alpha-mannose and UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylases by a regulator gene mutation; episomal dominance in partial diploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Mar;65(3):625–632. doi: 10.1073/pnas.65.3.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lieberman M. M., Markovitz A. Depression of guanosine diphosphate-mannose pyrophosphorylase by mutations in two different regulator genes involved in capsular polysaccharide synthesis in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1970 Mar;101(3):965–972. doi: 10.1128/jb.101.3.965-972.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MARKOVITZ A. REGULATORY MECHANISMS FOR SYNTHESIS OF CAPSULAR POLYSACCHARIDE IN MUCOID MUTANTS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI K12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Feb;51:239–246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.2.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mackie G., Wilson D. B. Regulation of the gal operon of Escherichia coli by the capR gene. J Biol Chem. 1972 May 25;247(10):2973–2978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Markovitz A., Rosenbaum N. A regulator gene that is dominant on an episome and recessive on a chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Oct;54(4):1084–1091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.4.1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nakanishi S., Adhya S., Gottesman M. E., Pastan I. In vitro repression of the transcription of gas operon by purified gal repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Feb;70(2):334–338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.2.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nisseley S. P., Anderson W. B., Gottesman M. E., Perlman R. L., Pastan I. In vitro transcription of the gal operon requires cyclic adenosine monophosphate and cyclic adenosine monophosphate receptor protein. J Biol Chem. 1971 Aug 10;246(15):4671–4678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parks J. S., Gottesman M., Perlman R. L., Pastan I. Regulation of galactokinase synthesis by cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate in cell-free extracts of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1971 Apr 25;246(8):2419–2424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Parks J. S., Gottesman M., Shimada K., Weisberg R. A., Perlman R. L., Pastan I. Isolation of the gal repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Aug;68(8):1891–1895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Perlman R. L., Pastan I. Pleiotropic deficiency of carbohydrate utilization in an adenyl cyclase deficient mutant of Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1969 Sep 24;37(1):151–157. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(69)90893-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rothman-Denes L. B., Hesse J. E., Epstein W. Role of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate in the in vivo expression of the galactose operon of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1973 Jun;114(3):1040–1044. doi: 10.1128/jb.114.3.1040-1044.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. SHERMAN J. R., ADLER J. Galactokinse from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1963 Mar;238:873–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. STACEY K. A., SIMSON E. IMPROVED METHOD FOR THE ISOLATION OF THYMINE-REQUIRING MUTANTS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI. J Bacteriol. 1965 Aug;90:554–555. doi: 10.1128/jb.90.2.554-555.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith T. F., Sadler J. R. The nature of lactose operator constitive mutations. J Mol Biol. 1971 Jul 28;59(2):273–305. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. TAYLOR A. L., THOMAN M. S. THE GENETIC MAP OF ESCHERICHIA COLI K-12. Genetics. 1964 Oct;50:659–677. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.4.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wetekam W., Staack K., Ehring R. DNA-dependent in vitro synthesis of enzymes of the galactose operon of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;112(1):14–27. doi: 10.1007/BF00266928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Witkin E. M. Ultraviolet-induced mutation and DNA repair. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1969;23:487–514. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.23.100169.002415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES